TAG | fundamental analysis
18
Why Value Investing and Trading Don’t Mix
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Why Value Investing and Trading Don’t Mix
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Tuesday, May 18, 2010: Issue #1262
Last week, I spoke at a special conference on value investing at the beautiful Driskill Hotel in Austin, TX.
Virtually every stock market investor talks about “recognizing value.” I’ve found that interest in value investing ebbs and flows depending on the market. No one wants to overpay for a stock, or keep holding one if the price gets nutty.
And that leads to a basic question: How do you find value in the stock market?
It depends whom you ask…
The Fathers of Value Investing
The fathers of value investing, of course, were Ben Graham and David Dodd, two teachers at Columbia Business School who wrote the investment classic, Security Analysis.
They argued that value investing is about buying companies that are selling below their intrinsic value.
How do you determine that? According to Graham & Dodd, that means buying companies that…
- Trade at significant discounts to book value.
- Have high dividend yields.
- Have low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios.
Buying this way is not only supposed to lead to higher returns. It’s also designed to provide a significant “margin of safety.” The idea is that if you buy a security right, your downside is limited.
A number of academic studies have shown that if you follow the principles of Graham and Dodd, you should do very well over the long term.
But there are potential problems with this approach…
Don’t Let a Cheap Stock Suck You In
First of all, stocks are rarely as cheap as they were back in the 1930s when Security Analysis was written. Or even as cheap as they were back in 1982 when the typical stock sold for less than book value and eight times earnings and yielded more than 6%.
And if you sat out the last 28 years out because stocks were too expensive, you missed an awful lot of opportunities.
When you do find a stock that does meets Graham and Dodd’s stringent requirements, you also need to be patient. Why? Because companies that are very cheap are out of favor for a reason. Sales are often flat or down. Earnings are weak. Profit margins are low.
You can’t succeed just by buying a company that’s cheap. (It can always become cheaper.) You have to buy a company that will someday – and perhaps not too far off – be dear to others. Otherwise, when will you take profits?
So maybe Graham and Dodd’s message needs modifying. (Warren Buffett, Graham’s most famous student, has certainly found ways to modify it.)
The Problem With Defining “Value”
I’ve found that the definition of value and the tools to achieve a margin of safety are flexible. And The Oxford Club has found successful ways to bend them.
To my mind, any stock that goes from $10 to $50 was a “value” at $10. I don’t care what the P/E or price-to-book was at the time. With the luxury of hindsight, it was clearly a bargain. Why quibble?
But die-hard value investors will argue that if the stock was “overvalued” at $10, it’s only more grossly so at $50 – and therefore, you’re at great risk holding it.
I disagree. If you use our customary trailing stops, your upside is unlimited and your profits fully protected. As long as a stock keeps trending up, we’re content to hold on – no matter what the valuation. When the stock eventually turns, as all do eventually, our stops will keep the profits from slipping through our fingers.
As for value analysis, quite frankly, we don’t spend a lot of time poring over P/Es and book values. We’re just interested in identifying companies that are likely to show dramatic, better-than-expected growth in the quarters ahead. These stocks tend to be more expensive than average, just as companies that will show little or no growth tend to be cheaper than average.
This method works, too…
Do You Have the Key Traits to Profit From This Approach?
The independent Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked our Communiqué among the top five newsletters in the United States for 10-year performance.
And our approach has one significant advantage over value investing. It works quickly.
- Growth stocks tend to sprint.
- Profits often come sooner rather than later.
As someone who spent 16 years as a money manager, I know that most investors don’t have the patience to be good value investors. (John Templeton, for instance, held companies in his flagship Templeton Growth Fund an average of 7.5 years.)
Yet clients will start to grouse if a stock doesn’t move for six months. They call it “dead money” and start itching to move it elsewhere.
I understand this instinct. But deep value investing and rapid trading don’t mix.
If you’re a patient, truly long-term oriented investor, value investing can work wonders. If you’re not, you’ll be better off searching for companies that are set to smash estimates.
When a stock doubles or triples – or rises 50-fold or more like Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) – don’t worry, other investors will concede it was a “value” before.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
P.S. If it’s value you’re looking for, look no further than The Oxford Club. For just $79, you’ll receive a whole year’s worth of our experts’ top stock recommendations, investment ideas and strategies that you can use to amass profits and build wealth.
You’ll see exactly why The Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked The Communiqué newsletter in the top five in the United States over the past 10 years and have a portfolio of your own that can weather the market’s storms, but thrive, too.
Take the guesswork out of the investing process and let some of the best, most successful analysts do the work for you. Sign up (risk-free) to The Oxford Club today.
6
Why the Euro Has Further to Tumble
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Why the Euro Has Further to Tumble
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Thursday, May 6, 2010: Issue #1254
Being a contrarian is a lonely business.
If you’re a regular reader, you’ll know that ordinarily, I am market neutral on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities.
The truth is that markets are reasonably efficient. So most years, I don’t stick my neck out and make any market calls on any asset class.
That’s because the vast majority of the time, most assets are neither grossly undervalued, nor wildly overvalued. Rational, self-interested investors keep prices close to true value.
But I am not an efficient market theorist. Investors are always self-interested, yes. But they are not always rational. And I most certainly do not believe that all publicly traded securities are efficiently priced all the time.
That would be lunacy…
Anomalies develop (and opportunities alongside them). Sometimes, these anomalies develop into outright bubbles. When that happens, you will always see eye-popping valuations paired with extreme sentiment. (In other words, sky-high prices and unbridled optimism or rock-bottom prices with extreme pessimism.)
What surprises me is how few investors recognize a bubble, even when it’s right under their nose and they have many thousands of dollars at risk…
Bubble Watch
For example…
- When I warned about the dangers of Internet stocks over a decade ago – I actually quit my Wall Street firm to take possession of my soaring pension shares – most respondents told me I was clearly ill-equipped to recognize the nature of opportunities in “the New Era.”
- Readers similarly scoffed at my warnings about the housing market five years ago. “Real estate always goes up,” they reminded me.
- At $150 a barrel, I wrote a column calling oil “The Mother of All Bubbles.” Demand was already waning and supply was rising as oil hit a new all-time high on various “peak oil” theories. It then quickly lost nearly two-thirds of its value.
- Five months ago – again, right here in Investment U – I predicted that the much-maligned dollar would soar against the euro. And yet again, my readers insisted that I was grossly mistaken and that a weaker dollar was “the ultimate no-brainer.”
Except it wasn’t…
Europe’s Monetary Policy Mish-Mash
Today, the euro hit a 14-month low against the dollar ($1.2689) on increasing recognition that Greece’s fiscal problems are bigger than expected, more expensive than expected and potentially contagious.
Trust me, this is far from over. The 16-member states in the Eurozone are about to start bickering like an old couple that has locked the keys in the car.
Understandably, weaker states don’t like having their economic policies dictated from Frankfurt. And stronger states don’t like spending billions to bail out their profligate brethren from years of fiscal mismanagement.
“Preposterous” Expectations for the Euro Against the Dollar
When the euro was born on January 1, 1999, skeptics rightly worried that the then-11-member states were too divergent to share a single currency and monetary policy.
These fears were well-founded. And the euro promptly plunged on world currency markets to well under $0.90. Today, we know that problems among member states aren’t just possible… not just probable… but right here, stinking to high heaven on our doorstep.
Yet the euro is still trading around $1.27.
Expect it to hit $1.10 by the end of this year – and trade at parity with the dollar sometime next year.
Sounds preposterous? Yes, so I’ve heard.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Editor’s Note: Find out how The Oxford Club’s “market neutral” investment approach, combined with a keen eye for lucrative contrarian recommendations, led the Hulbert Financial Digest to rank the group’s Communiqué in the top five investment newsletters over the past 10 years.
Sign up for a risk-free trial today and you’ll get all the latest investing ideas, insights and recommendations from our analysts that will give you the opportunity to make consistent profits year after year. Check out the full list of benefits here.
